27 November 2006

 

Cambodia: Hun Sen's Hand in Genocide Trial Delays?

 

By Marwaan Macan-Markar

 

BANGKOK — The long-delayed special tribunal to prosecute the

surviving leaders of the genocidal Khmer Rouge regime has hit a verbal barrage

that exposes the murky side of Cambodian politics.

 

The prime mover, whose actions are being viewed with alarm in some quarters

in the country, is Ky Tech, president of the Cambodian Bar Association (CBA).

Over a week ago, he demanded that foreign lawyers stop participating in the

Tribunal—known officially as the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of

Cambodia (ECCC).

 

By Wednesday, his demand to make the exercise of legal representation

a completely Cambodian one, despite local lawyers being poorly trained

or lacking knowledge of international law, had intensified. "We are

being violated by foreigners," Ky Tech was quoted as having told the

English-language 'Cambodian Daily'.

 

Such animosity resulted Friday in the International Bar Association (IBA)

abruptly stopping a training programme that was to be held this week to

make Cambodian lawyers sensitive to the scope of justice in cases dealing

with crimes against humanity, a charge that the Khmer Rouge leaders face.

 

The CBA has issued instructions "forbidding lawyers from attending

a training programme" planned by the IBA and the ECCC, states the IBA

on its website. "The Bar's president, Ky Tech, has publicly threatened

that 'measures' will be taken against any attendee, and against the

IBA's international participants."

 

"The Bar's actions represent a disturbing development in the functioning

of international justice, placing obstacles in the path of bringing those

accused of international crimes to trial," says Mark Ellis, executive director

of the London-based IBA. "The IBA's programme was intended to improve the

quality of legal services and the administration of justice in Cambodia, and

help educate and inform the Cambodian public about international justice."

 

The IBA's involvement in strengthening legal systems faced with the challenge

of handling war crimes tribunals is spread across regions where the murder of

civilians on a mass scale has occurred. It has trained lawyers, prosecutors and

judges involved in special tribunals that dealt with the crimes against humanity

in former Yugoslavia and, more recently, training the judges of the Iraqi High

Tribunal.

 

So the objections to the IBA's involvement in the Cambodian tribunal have

given rise to speculation that Ky Tech's motives may not be his alone, or

that of the CBA. After all, the country's justice system is known for its

questionable record on upholding human rights, being heavily politicised and

even accused of corruption.

 

"The CBA president has become vocal to a degree that it is hard to believe that

he is saying these things without political backing," Theary Seng, executive

director of the Centre for Social Development (CSD), a non-governmental

organisation (NGO), said in a telephone interview from Phnom Penh. "It seems

to be aimed to either slow the process, or even stall it. This is worrying."

 

Cambodian human rights groups are equally alarmed, more so because they

are aware of who Ky Tech's political patrons are. "There can be some

political influence behind this statement," Ny Chakrya, a ranking member of

the Cambodian Human Rights and Development Association, a Phnom Penh-based NGO,

told IPS. "Some CBA lawyers work closely with the CPP (Cambodian People's

Party). Ky Tech is pro-CPP."

 

Such allegations directed at the governing CPP, led by Prime Minister Hun Sen,

are not the first pointing to its attempts to scupper a legal process that

Cambodian civilians have been yearning for. The increasingly authoritarian

Hun Sen has been a serial opponent of the special tribunal ever since the

United Nations began talks with the Phnom Penh regime over a decade ago

to create the ECCC.

 

Hun Sen's sensitivity towards the ECCC was on display in May, when he lashed

out at human rights groups who called into question Cambodia's choice of judges

to sit on a tribunal that stands out—unlike the ones for Rwanda and former

Yugoslavia—in having a combination of local and international jurists to be

part of the entire legal process.

 

He "likened his critics to perverted sex-crazed animals, among other things,"

the Hong Kong-based Asian Human Rights Commission, a regional rights lobby, said

on the occasion. Human rights groups were not happy at the choice of Ney Thol,

an army general and president of Cambodia's military court, being among the

17 local jurists for the ECCC. He has a record of denying the right for

lawyers of the accused to call their own witnesses and to cross-examine

the prosecution's witnesses.

 

What is more, a question still hangs in the air over Hun Sen if his name is

dragged into the tribunal's proceedings, which formally got underway this year

after years of delay.  He was a member of the Khmer Rouge till he defected

to join forces with the Vietnamese troops that drove out Pol Pot, the leader

of that brutal regime, from power in 1979.

 

During their reign of terror between 1975-79, this extreme Maoist group,

which wanted to create an agrarian utopia, was responsible for the death of

close to 1.7 million people, nearly a quarter of this poor South-east Asian

country's population at that time.  The victims were executed or died of

forced labour or famine.

 

Pol Pot died in 1998, evading justice. But other leaders of the brutal regime

have survived, like Kaing Khek Eav, also known as 'Duch,' who presided over the

Toul Sleng interrogation centre in the Cambodian capital, where 14,000 people

accused of being traitors died and only 12 inmates survived.

 

For Cambodian women like Theary Seng, the thought of further delay in the

ECCC's work will only add pain to a public deeply traumatised by Khmer Rouge

attrocities and still searching for answers as to why it happened. It is

reflected in the public meetings her NGO has been running since early this year

to prepare the public for this unprecedented trial.

 

"We bring experts from the ECCC to these meetings so that the people from

the villages can get direct answers from them," she adds. "There are so many

questions out there about the KRT (Khmer Rouge Trial)."

 

At the most recent meeting in a province, an elderly man asked, "I have

waited for 30 years. Who ordered people to be killed?"  In that account,

which appeared in an edition of the 'Phnom Penh Post,' another man said,

"They murdered six members of my family in Takeo. In Kratie I went to jail

with my family. I beg the NGOs to find the power to give me and my family

justice."

 

 

Copyright 2006

Inter Press Service